The Author Online Book Forums are Moving

The Author Online Book Forums will soon redirect to Manning's liveBook and liveVideo. All book forum content will migrate to liveBook's discussion forum and all video forum content will migrate to liveVideo. Log in to liveBook or liveVideo with your Manning credentials to join the discussion!

Thank you for your engagement in the AoF over the years! We look forward to offering you a more enhanced forum experience.

proebuck (60) [Avatar] Offline
Despise the new callout style. As example, see Listing 2.3.

Go back to using dingbat circled digits (e.g., ?) like everyone else on the planet does, rather than the current hash-letter scheme (e.g., #A).

[Edit] Post replaced my preferred callout example.
See for what I'm talking about.
welkie (26) [Avatar] Offline
I thought the hash style was something Jeremy was using for these MEAP drafts and that it would be replaced by the circled numbers later. I would be disappointed if it was kept this way. The code examples with the inline numbered labels are one of the things I like most about Manning books. I wasn't a fan of having to keep looking up and down back and forth to read the labels for #1, #2, #3, etc.
jeremy.wilken (208) [Avatar] Offline
This is a decision by Manning on how they wish to format their comments. I'll share your comments with them, but I personally cannot change the way they are doing callouts.
welkie (26) [Avatar] Offline
Gotcha. Please do forward it to them. I can't speak for everyone, but for me, the numbered arrows with inline comments were very effective. smilie
helen.stergius (15) [Avatar] Offline
Hi - The # style is only during development, while the book is in its MEAP form.
I've attached an excerpt from Jeremy's book with the final style.

It does, as Jeremy has pointed out to me, make it hard to reference a specific code block in the text, which the cue balls were pretty good at.

I'm going to pass that on.