hettlage (133) [Avatar] Offline
#1
Happy New Year 2017!

I know, it's a bit pedantic, but the wording of the test description "The Contact class should have a valid constuctor [sic]" in listing 2.7 arguably suggests that you need the empty constructor in the definition of Contact. But leaving out the constructor is perfectly fine:

export class Contact {
}
Jesse Palmer (53) [Avatar] Offline
#2
hettlage wrote:Happy New Year 2017!

I know, it's a bit pedantic, but the wording of the test description "The Contact class should have a valid constuctor [sic]" in listing 2.7 arguably suggests that you need the empty constructor in the definition of Contact. But leaving out the constructor is perfectly fine:

export class Contact {
}


Happy New Year!

I agree, you don't really need an empty constructor at that point, it doesn't add anything. You will need to add it a little later, though. I'll remove in the first step. Thanks for the input!

Jesse