The Author Online Book Forums are Moving

The Author Online Book Forums will soon redirect to Manning's liveBook and liveVideo. All book forum content will migrate to liveBook's discussion forum and all video forum content will migrate to liveVideo. Log in to liveBook or liveVideo with your Manning credentials to join the discussion!

Thank you for your engagement in the AoF over the years! We look forward to offering you a more enhanced forum experience.

timmi4sa (2) [Avatar] Offline
Thank you for such a great book!

Just noticed a minor typo in the last sentence of section 4.4 (Novel Uses of Nullable Types) the section reference "3.2.6" seems to be incorrect. The "TryXXX" pattern is described in section 3.3.3 (on page 81).

(a very detailed and frequently updated errata page of yours makes this book even greater, almost as if it were a "firmware" update)!
jon.skeet (483) [Avatar] Offline
Re: Minor Erratum in section reference p. 131

I'm really glad you're enjoying the book - and well done for spotting the mistake! (It's great to have such keen-eyed readers.)

I've added an erratum:

Personally while I feel the errata page (which is now sadly larger than I'd like - but at least few of them are genuine technical mistakes which could mislead readers) is all very well, the notes are much more interesting. This is primarily because they're mostly comments from people who are smarter than me. Speaking of which, I must get round to adding Ben Albahari's comments at some point...
djohnson (22) [Avatar] Offline
Re: Minor Erratum in section reference p. 131
I really want to agree with Tim about the importance of an up-to-date errata sheet, especially combined with your quick responses to questions on this forum. Maybe it's like this, when I'm reading a book, often I don't quite understand what's going on. I need to persist until I do, and basically it works a lot better if I can trust the author. If there's something which isn't working, I need to know, is it my mistake, or the author's (usually the former, of course). Being able to resolve the issues which are typos, etc., quickly, really cuts down on the friction of this process.

I don't know if I've explained this well, maybe someone else can do it better, but one thing I'm trying to say is, I really appreciate the effort you've put into the book website, in particular the errata sheet.
jon.skeet (483) [Avatar] Offline
Re: Minor Erratum in section reference p. 131
I quite agree - I didn't really express myself properly in my previous comment. Up-to-date errata are very important - but in the same way that airbags in a car are important. You really need them to be there, but it's hard to get excited about them.

I regard the notes section of the web site as being analogous to finding out that your car has a built-in MP3 player which can download songs from your home server while it's parked outside the house - something cool but not really vital.
djohnson (22) [Avatar] Offline
Re: Minor Erratum in section reference p. 131
You know, you're probably right. I think what's more important is that the errata in your book are not serious mistakes. That is probably what causes the actual excitement. When I notice a mistake, I can check quickly that it's not serious, and get back to reading the book, still keeping my confidence in you as the author.
jon.skeet (483) [Avatar] Offline
Re: Minor Erratum in section reference p. 131
Yeah - I was hugely lucky to have Eric Lippert as tech reviewer. There weren't *very* many technical mistakes before his review, but he certainly got rid of some that would have been embarrassing (as well as just generally helping the tone and polish of the whole thing).