Scavok (10) [Avatar] Offline
There is an inconsistent treatment of the version number for Listing 1.1 in the second edition:

On the one hand, the actual code on page five (and the reproduced line on page six) use "1.0"; on the other hand, this paragraph on page six uses "1.1":

"The first line of the program simply sets the version number for the program to 1.1, matching the section number of the book."
daviangel (7) [Avatar] Offline
Re: typo, 2nd Ed., inconsistent use of "1.1" and "1.0" for version number
I noticed that too it look like a minor typo.